Twas the Night associated with Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Twas the Night associated with Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Day might the Zombie Apocalypse arrive on Xmas? You’ll bet on it! (Image:

Every year punters place bets on whether or not they will wake up up to a blanket that is snowy their streets on Christmas morning. It is the old romantic in each of us that longs for this backdrop that is scenic a joyous day, surrounded by our loved ones and overeating with all the current Christmas trimmings, cannibalizing and distributing our infectious zombie disease. Wait. What?

Betting on Zombies

While some are gambling on a white Christmas, UK bookmaking giant Ladbrokes is offering odds of 2000/1 on this Christmas being the beginning of the Zombie Apocalypse. That’s a nice, festive thought to possess, and beats the odds they provide for football team Crystal Palace winning the Premier League this year at 5000/1. Speak about harmful gambling.

’we have been quite confident that the odds of the Zombie Apocalypse at 2000/1 are correct, and although the public should exert caution on the Christmas period, they need to not be unduly concerned about the undead rising up to attack and eat the living,’ announced Alex Donohue, a spokesman for the Ladbrokes bookmaker.

Odds for a white Christmas currently stand at 5/1, which really is a much better chance compared to those offered on the doomsday coming associated with the undead, and you are much more likely in order to claim your winnings after a bit of snow in the place of having to fight your way through the zombie hordes to gather your reward. If you got that bet right, that’s for sure although you would be pretty smug with yourself.

While the chance to bet on the Zombie Apocalypse is significantly more than likely a nice bit of publicity for Ladbrokes, Sean Page zombie expert and founder regarding the Ministry of Zombies has urged the public to prepare for the worst.

’The public is obviously interested in the chances of a white xmas, but they should really be more concerned by the increasing chance of the Zombie Apocalypse,’ reported Page, suggesting, perhaps, that he’s nipping at the whiskey by having a bit alacrity that is too much.

’The most time that is likely an outbreak is during the busy holiday season as people save money time in large groups, which makes it easier for the zombie virus to distribute, triggering the Apocalypse,’ Page included. Evidently, he’s seen it happen prior to.

Bets That Are Dead On

2000/1 seems a bit too low for the likelihood of a zombie epidemic really, but this isn’t the time that is first has offered the opportunity to place wagers on the Apocalypse, as they additionally offered exactly the same chances regarding the outbreak of a undead siege on December 21st 2012, owing to all of the hype around the end of the Mayan calendar to which doomsday ’enthusiasts’ were clinging hopefully in expectation of these impending doom.

Strangely enough, Ladbrokes are also providing more likely odds of 500/1 in the possibility of Prince Harry getting hitched to Miley Cyrus, but the smart profit this instance would most likely be on the zombies, despite the fact that you would be unlikely to recoup any wager due to the, you realize, end of the planet and all that. So less ’nothing was stirring’ and more ’watch out for the bloodthirsty, flesh-eating undead outside the door.’

MGM Clears Hurdles in Massachusetts; Gaming Commission Nevertheless Must Okay

MGM Resorts is almost through the regulatory gauntlet in Massachusetts for their Springfield casino project (Image: Artist’s rendering of casino)

Just when you thought nobody would ever be good sufficient for Massachusetts’ insanely fastidious gaming commission, the MGM actually earned their approbation this week. The commission’s investigative arm that could have its TV that is own series ’MGC P.I.’ suggested that MGM Resorts be found suitable to move forward with their Springfield casino project, with the caveat that MGM executives have the ability to talk their way out of a few lingering concerns of the commission, concerns that came to light as soon as the commission conducted its regulatory background check regarding the casino company.

Cleared for Remove

When we state ’lengthy’, we aren’t whistling Dixie; the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement invested days gone by 10 months looking through every speck of dirt that anyone connected with MGM ever came across, and amazingly noted that they found nothing that would automatically disqualify the group from establishing up house into the pristine state of Massachusetts.

But it is not really a done deal yet; the five Massachusetts Gaming Commissioners still get to have the last term on whether or not MGM is able to do business within their neck of the woods. But if they give their papal blessing towards the company, MGM will then manage to submit their last application as the best western Massachusetts casino license that will likely be given out; and since they’re the actual only real remaining applicant, that would seem to be a pretty complete deal.

The actual only real tiny ding that the Bureau could dig up after almost a 12 months of searching all documented in a 500-page report on the subject was MGM’s method of dealing former executive board member Terry Christensen, who in 2008 was convicted on costs involving the wiretapping of business mogul Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife when Kerkorian ended up being included in a gruesome child support fight.

’Despite their indictment, resignation through the Board and ultimate conviction, Christensen was allowed to activate, on a repeated and prolonged basis, in some sensitive and non-public business things of MGM Resorts … including his attendance at Board meetings,’ scolded the report.

In this dance of mea culpa, MGM CEO James Murren took the position of penitent profligate using the Commission as of this week’s hearing, noting that it absolutely was an error for the company to allow bad kid Christensen to carry on in every capacity with the business.

’I exercised poor judgment,’ stated Murren, who was simply the outfit’s CFO whenever all this took place. ’It was an idea that is bad the very beginning. None of us should have had any experience of (Christensen).’

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

More Executive Contrition

Murren wasn’t the only one to throw himself in the mercy regarding the court, as present MGM board member (and head of its review committee) Roland Hernandez made a point to share with commissioners that protocols are now in position in the company to ensure here will undoubtedly be no repeats of the poor process that is decision-making.

All that was then left for the commish to deal with had been several concerns they had about some MGM dealings in Macau; mostly, these centered around a former partnership with Chinese company mogul (and child of casino mega-mogul Stanley Ho) Pansy Ho. Ho had been deemed unsuitable as somebody during a 2010 New Jersey hearing that is regulatory the matter, and as such, MGM had to unload a 50 % stake in an Atlantic City casino there, just to keep their nose clean. The allegations had been that Ho’s daddy Stanley had had transactions with some Chinese gangs, a definite ’no-no’ in today’s regulatory video gaming universe.

Hernandez had to the Massachusetts commissioners that Ms. Ho had been included with MGM completely split from her father, and that she was primarily involved in non-gaming business tasks regarding their MGM Macau property. Hernandez also noted that other, less finicky, states had been okay with the Ho interaction; particularly, Nevada and Maryland, both of which had no problem with it. He additionally noted that New Jersey has now softened their own stance, and may enable MGM back to the fold in Atlantic City.

The panel should rule later this week; the commission’s chair Stephen Crosby won’t say which way the wind is blowing, but noted he appreciated the MGM execs’ openness in dealing with these issues.

But also being truly the only applicant and even in the event cleared by the commission this week, it is still perhaps not a 100 % slam-dunk for MGM Resorts.

’One applicant or 10, we’ll hold their feet to the fire to make sure we have a application that is really good’ Crosby encouraged reporters during a hearing break.

Setback for PokerStars as brand New Jersey Bars Licensing for just two Years

PokerStars got a smack from New Jersey regulators this week if they put them in licensing limbo for the following two years

If there’s one name that has dominated the American on line poker market over the decade that is last it has to be PokerStars. However, if you’re residing in nj, you should not expect to be playing for a site operated by the poker giant any right time quickly.

Two Years in Limbo

The nj-new Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement determined this week to suspend the overview of PokerStars’ application for an online gambling license for couple of years, effectively locking the organization out of the state’s online poker market for that time frame.

’The Division of Gaming Enforcement has determined that the use of Rational Services Limited (PokerStars) casino solution industry licensure (CSIE) is held in a suspended status for a period of two years,’ the Division said in a statement.

However, the door is not entirely closed on PokerStars.

’The Division, within that period, may think about a demand for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated, at which time the Division’s investigation of PokerStars as well as its entities that are affiliated associated individuals is resumed to evaluate suitability.’

Bad Company, Bad Actor

Although PokerStars has long settled its case with the government and admitted no wrongdoing as a part of that settlement New Jersey regulators still have some problems with the company. Chief the type of appears to be their relationship with founder Isai Scheinberg, who has been under federal indictment since Black Friday. Scheinberg isn’t U.S. citizen, and have not come to the U.S. to face those costs, to no one’s surprise.

While this is a huge loss for PokerStars, it also marks a giant win for its competitors in the New Jersey market. As we reported recently, the site run by PartyPoker jointly with the Borgata Casino currently includes a 50 percent share of the state’s poker marketplace, because of the Caesars/888 World group of Poker site not far behind. Those two companies could have been overshadowed easily by the PokerStars site which will have already been operated in conjunction with Resorts Casino and were hoping that their head start would give them a benefit that would allow them to keep competitive. Now, they’ll have at least two years to produce brand loyalty, something that PokerStars may have a hard time overcoming, if when they are finally certified for New Jersey’s online marketplace.

PokerStars ended up being predictably not thrilled by the news, though they noted that the state’s decision could improvement in the long run.

’We are disappointed that the N.J. Division of Gaming Enforcement has suspended the review of our application at this right time,’ said PokerStars spokesman Eric Hollreiser in a statement. ’We note that the DGE will resume the report on our application if our circumstances change. We shall stay static in open discussion with the DGE and will update them on changes in our situation while they occur.’

This wasn’t initial disappointing result for PokerStars in nj-new jersey. Previously, the ongoing company had attempted to get the Atlantic Club Casino, only to have that deal break apart over concerns about whether regulators would approve the purchase. That decision ended up being also high priced, as PokerStars lost about $11 million they had spent on casino expenses a total that was supposed to be used towards the eventual $15 million cost.