Tennis Match Repairing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Tennis <span id="more-13243"></span>Match Repairing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Few would accuse anybody of match repairing at Wimbledon, but many say that the practice is widespread among lower-ranked players at smaller events.

Tennis was faced with accusations of match fixing for years: from the match that is infamous Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much of this public to questions about the integrity of matches in some smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, there always generally seems to be something lurking underneath the sport’s surface.

Those concerns were aired once more this in a story by The Daily Beast, which once again attempted to delve through the information out there about tennis and figure out just how much of a problem match fixing is for the sport week.

One 2014 research cited in that story estimated that one percent of all of the first-round tournament matches might be fixed, which may mean more than 20 matches a year were influenced by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have suggested that multiple matches each week could be fixed, though that’s nevertheless a really small percentage of all professional tennis matches.

Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players

Why is tennis so susceptible to match fixing?

There are a combination of factors, a lot of which help explain why the issue seems most prominent during the lower levels of this expert ranks.

First, there’s well-known reality that tennis (at least in singles play) is a sport that is individual.

There is certainly only someone that needs to be bribed in order to get them to throw a match (the same issue leading many to fear extensive integrity issues in boxing as well as other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to pick up the slack for the player whom is struggling.

Having said that, nobody is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.

For just one, there is the fact why these matches have a powerful quantity of scrutiny on them; perhaps even moreover, though, star tennis players are exceedingly well paid, meaning it would price anyone attempting to fix a match at that level an exorbitant quantity of cash, if it could be done at all.

That is not to say that nobody attempts. Even Novak Djokovic has told an account of being offered $100,000 to fix a match back in 2006.

But players on the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors aren’t making nearly that much money, and might even lose money in an offered tournament after travel and coaching expenses are taken under consideration.

That produces them targets that are prime gamblers looking to fix a match.

Spot Betting Allows Fixing Without Impacting Match Result

Another issue is the very fact that gamblers do not even have to repair an entire match to find techniques to benefit.

Because many gambling sites and bookmakers offer wagering on sets or games that are even individual players can achieve agreements allowing certain occasions to occur during the right times to satisfy gamblers while still playing to win overall.

’One particular fix that is common be to divide the first two sets up to a predetermined script, then play the 3rd set fairly to determine which player progresses,’ sports modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this year.

The Tennis Integrity Unit could be the physical body tasked with rooting out such problems, and they have often made examples of players. In March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption rules, though not for match-fixing.

But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, its unlikely in order to alter the culture that allows lower-ranked players to be incentivized to help gamblers who would like to make bets that are sure.

That would require a complete change in how compensation works up and down the various levels of expert tennis, something that will most likely not happen any time quickly.

New Jersey Online DDoS Attacks on Regulated Sites Arrive with Bitcoin Ransom Notes

Present nj-new Jersey DDoS attacks on unnamed regulated sites were along with a ransom note future that is promising more severe attacks should businesses not comply. (Image:

DDoS (distributed denial of service) isn’t reality that any online video gaming business ever would like to handle, but some regulated brand New Jersey sites had to do just that the other day.

New Jersey’s fledgling online gambling industry has been targeted, apparently for the first-time, by these distributed attacks.

Late week that is last at least four unnamed web sites were derailed by a hacker, or hackers, who flooded the web sites’ bandwidths with traffic, rendering them inoperable, and ultimately using them offline for around half an hour.

The attacks had been accompanied by a ransom note for an undisclosed sum, payable in Bitcoin, with a risk of an even more severe attack to follow.

Maybe Not New, But Frustrating

DDoS attacks are nothing new for the online gambling industry, of program. In fact, they’re as old as the industry it self, but there are suggestions that incidents of this unwanted actions have been growing. Some experts even claim that assaults across all industries that are online doubled in 2014.

High-profile operators in the receiving end last year included Betfair, which was targeted on Grand National day, the UK horse race that is biggest meet regarding the year with regards to betting.

Attackers usually time their efforts to coincide with large sporting events in the hope that operators only will pay up as opposed to lose company. PokerStars, Unibet, and state that is swedish monopoly Svenska Spel may also be all recent victims.

Chances of Prosecution Slim

Inspite of the interruption that is initial it appears that the situation has become stable and has been effectively dealt with by the New Jersey market’s cybersecurity teams. The battle between online gambling sites therefore the hackers is certainly one of mouse and cat, of strategy and counterstrategy: as protection technology improves, so do the hackers’ efforts to breach it.

New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement President David Rebuck said this that the matter was now being investigated by state police, the FBI, and the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, as well as his own organization week. The different agencies, he said, were hunting a ’known actor’ who’d ’done this before.’

Chances of prosecution are slim, however. Up to now, just two men have been convicted for launching DDoS attacks. Those were two UK-based Poles who made the blunder of threatening an operator they knew personally and agreeing to meet up with him in a resort space. The operator, of course, brought the police with him. In 2013, the pair that is hapless sentenced to 5 years in prison by way of a court in great britain.

LVS Attack

Such attacks are not limited to online gambling, of course. In February 2014, Las Vegas Sands Corporation (LVS), owned by anti-online curmudgeon Sheldon Adelson, had been afflicted by a massive cyber attack that ended up being believed to have emanated from Iran. On February 10, LVS was plunged into chaos as computers started flatlining and servers shutting down. Hard disks were wiped clean as malware ripped through the business’s networks.

The decision was taken to sever the multibillion dollar operation completely from the Internet as hackers began compressing and downloading batches of sensitive files, comprising everything from high-roller credit checks to details of global computer systems.

The attack caused an estimated $20 million worth of damage. The attackers subsequently claimed their DDoS actions had been been motivated after hearing remarks made by Adelson in 2013 about ’dropping the bomb’ on Iran.

NY Casino License Bidding Process Receives One Applicant

Tiago Downs, the single bidder for the fourth NY casino license, proposes an improved expansion package having unsuccessful to impress last December. (Image:

Regulators in New York State have slim pickings once they come to determine on the winner regarding the 4th Upstate casino license in the economically deprived Southern Tier region.

Just one contender submitted a proposition for Monday’s due date, while a rival pulled out at the minute that is last.

The Tioga Downs racino in Nichols is the one and only applicant for the area, with a $195 million expansion proposal to its current center.

The aborted proposition, from businessman Jeffrey C. Hyman, was pulled having been dealt ’a fatal blow’ by the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation.

Hyman said his project would have been ’seismic,’ which might have been what the ecological individuals were complaining about in the first place, particularly when you consider it has an ongoing debate about fracking within the area.


Unfortunately, Jeff Gural, owner of Tioga Downs, neglected to impress the Gaming Control Board at the first certification hearing with his task in December 2014, although he has since come up by having an improved package.

In the past, the board suggested three casino licenses, for Monticello, into the Catskills; Schenectady; and the Finger Lakes area, snubbing the Southern Tier and Tioga Downs entirely, despite having been granted the powers to recommend a fourth license.

Gural was furious during the decision and highly critical of the board. He argued that a casino in the Southern Tier would be perfectly rational, as the closest competitor is Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, 90 miles south in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

’It’s got nothing to do with me personally, I can pay for,’ he fumed. ’But the people of the Southern Tier?’

’And what really pisses me down,’ he continued, warming to their theme, ’is the governor asked me personally to spend $800,000 of my money to pass law that is local, Proposition One [on the expansion of casino gaming]. What was that all about? I mean… the entire thing is sickening in all honesty with you.’


Such had been the outcry among locals, in fact, that Governor Andrew Cuomo intervened, requesting that the Gaming Commission reconsider.

’As this would be the license that is last in New York State, it may excite national competition by interested parties that distribute better yet applications than the first round,’ advised Cuomo. ’ If you agree to this request, the [casino board] should quickly establish an activity for the 4th license that could be complete as expeditiously as possible, as the Southern Tier needs jobs and investment now.’

The board complied, a decision it might now be sorry for, itself facing a ’bidding war’ of one and under political pressure to award a license to a man who has recently been highly critical of its decision making processes as it finds.