California State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer, whose brand new online poker bill is far more inclusive than previous drafts, would welcome racetracks and PokerStars into the Golden State video gaming market too.
A new California on the web poker bill, sponsored by State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), is currently on the table to oppose the bill introduced by fellow State Assemblyman Mike Gatto in December.
The Sawyer-Jones bill, AB 167, seeks to determine ’a proper structure that is regulatory place providing you with safe and compliant internet poker access,’ the assemblyman announced yesterday.
So how do the two new bills compare? And much more to the level, how exactly does the Jones-Sawyer that is new bill with his past bill, AB2291, which foundered regarding the rocks of final year’s legislative session?
No actors that are bad
Jones-Sawyer said by the end of the 2014 session that a new, revised bill would be a high priority for 2015, and indicated that this time, the ’bad actor’ language would be softened. The non-severable actor that is bad of AB229 proved to become a sticking point for stakeholders, and caused an important schism between those who wanted PokerStars in the market and those whom didn’t.
Sure enough, AB 167 seems to have eliminated those actor that is bad, apparently clearing the means for PokerStars to enter a regulated Ca market. Those precluded from applying for a poker that is online, states the bill, consist of:
’The person [who] has contemptuously defied a legislative investigative body, or other formal investigative human body of a state or of the united states of america or a foreign jurisdiction, whenever that body is engaged in the investigation of crimes relating to poker, official corruption related to poker activities, or criminal profiteering activity or organized crime, as defined in part l 86.2 of this Penal Code.’
The bill goes on to clarify a key position that could straight affect PokerStars possible entry into the Golden State market, given its previously vilified owners vs. its new, ’clean slate’ ones.
’ The person [who] has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of a felony consisting of either having accepted a bet over the Internet in violation of United States or California law, or having abetted or aided that unlawful task.’
Note the employment regarding the word ’person,’ which suggests that PokerStars, by divesting itself of its previous owners, against whom there were outstanding DOJ indictments, would manage to be involved in the California on line market unscathed.
Anti-PokerStars Coalition Denounces Language
The language is in sharp contrast with that of final year’s bill from Jones-Sawyer, which proposed to exclude ’any brand or company name, including any derivative brand with the same or similar wording, or any trade or solution mark, computer software, technology, functional system, customer information, or other data acquired, derived, or developed directly or indirectly from any operation that has accepted a wager or engaged in a financial deal associated with such wager from any individual in the us on any form of Internet gaming after December 31, 2006.’
If Jones-Sawyer thinks his bill will sail through because of the backing associated with the stakeholders, however, he has another think coming, as the anti-PokerStars coalition that is tribal no amount of time in denouncing this language.
’There is much for tribes to dislike about it bill,’ said Pechanga Chairman Mark Macarro. ’We are disappointed that the bill disregards important principles from the broad coalition of respected tribes and card rooms that help prevent corporations and entities that previously violated federal law from profiting from tainted software, brands, and databases derived from illegal activity.’
Photo Finish for Racetracks and Liquidity
Other major news for AB 167 may be the inclusion of California racetracks in a post-regulation landscape, which many felt had been unjustly ignored by past bills. The sharing of liquidity along with other states, expressly forbidden in preceding draft bills, seems to be on the menu this time, and there is additionally a suggestion that players on unlicensed sites could be prosecuted.
The license fee would cost $10 million, with a tax-rate set at 8.5 percent of gross gaming revenue. Once language has been agreed upon, the bill shall require two-thirds associated with the vote to pass.
New Bill Would Decriminalize Fantasy Sports in Washington
State Senator Pam Roach introduced a bill that could legalize fantasy sports games in the state of Washington. (Image: PamRoach.com)
The state of Washington is understood for having a number of the harshest gambling that is online in the United States.
However these laws go even more than many realize: Washington additionally considers fantasy sports to be described as a form of gambling, and thus players who put money into their online fantasy sports leagues are theoretically breaking the law, and could even be charged with a felony underneath the same laws that criminalize online poker and casino games.
That’s something that numerous officials that are local like to be changed.
With an estimated 500,000 residents in the state fantasy that is playing games, State Senator Pam Roach (R-31st District) says it’s time for you to reclassify the contests as being a game of skill instead than as luck-based gambling.
’Our state sees dream football being a game of chance a felony crime,’ Roach said. ’Congress has long considered dream soccer become a game of skill. My bill shall replace the state’s definition.’
Washington Residents Restricted from Fantasy Sports Sites
Right now, many major fantasy that is online outlets block Washington residents from participating on their sites, including top daily fantasy sites like FanDuel and DraftKings.
Traditional season leagues that are long web sites like ESPN.com are usually available to Washington residents, however they are typically ineligible to win rewards.
The problem is the fact that many states see dream sports as a casino game of skill.
Nevertheless the Washington State Gambling Commission still views luck as a big enough factor to classify it as gambling under present state laws.
’There’s always the possibility the Seattle Seahawks will keep coming back from two touchdowns down with two minutes left,’ said commission chairman Chris Stearns, discussing the Seahawks’ improbable comeback within the NFC Championship game weekend that is last. ’Whereas in most states, the undeniable fact that you have invested all of this time poring over stats and making your spreadsheets that are own that’s the skill part, and that weighs most heavily.’
Sports Betting Would Remain Prohibited
Under the proposed law, there would still be a prohibition on placing bets on the result of real life events that are sporting.
Nevertheless, both day-to-day and season-long fantasy activities will be expressly appropriate, even for real cash play.
The bill seems to have better odds than a bill that is similar would decriminalize and regulate online poker; the dream recreations bill has bi-partisan support and has found a number of sponsors on both sides of the aisle.
Companion bills have now been introduced in both the House of Representatives and their state Senate.
The Fantasy supports the legalization effort Sports Trade Association, a market group based away from Chicago.
According to your combined group, more than 41 million people in America and Canada play fantasy sports, and nearly half of them play for real cash.
’We think citizens of Washington should really be able to have fun with the full array of fantasy sports contests offered in 45 other states and be able to win prizes in free contests offered by major media businesses,’ said association chairman Peter Schoenke in a statement.
Washington is one of five states in which residents are typically obstructed from playing on day-to-day fantasy sports sites.
Even as we recently reported, momentum is increasing in many of these states to legalize games that are such recently, a Montana lawmaker introduced a bill that would enable residents to take part in contests where the entry charge had been $100 or less.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Rejects Kenosha Casino Project
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has rejected a proposed casino in Kenosha, with some saying the move may be associated with his presidential aspirations. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has put the kibosh on a proposed casino plan, saying that building the venue would simply be too costly to taxpayers to be permitted.
In a declaration, Walker said that the continuing state might have been liable for up to $100 million to the Potawatomi tribe, which owns a casino in Milwaukee, due to agreements involving the tribe and hawaii.
The agreement between Wisconsin and the Potawatomi tribe, the state is responsible for reimbursing the tribe for any revenue lost to other casinos that open in the state under the compact that governs.
’After a review that is comprehensive of possible economic impact of the proposed Kenosha casino project, the risk to the state’s taxpayers is too great,’ Walker stated in a declaration. ’Due to the compacts negotiated by Governor Doyle, the current expense to taxpayers of approving the proposed casino task is up to $100 million plus the long-lasting economic hit to the state budget would be a potential loss of vast sums of dollars.’
The casino that is new which would have cost about $800 million to build, would be to be a joint endeavor between the Menominee Tribe and intense Rock, which would have been in charge of operating the casino. The project was approved in 2013 by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, nonetheless it still needed approval from the governor of Wisconsin before it could go forward.
Casino Supporters See Politics Behind Decision
The Menominee Tribe saw other motivations behind his decision while Walker said the rejection was a way to protect residents of the state from a financial obligation.
’One tribe, the Forest County Potawatomi and one goal of Governor Walker, the presidency, has resulted in a ’no’ for our people,’ the tribe said in a declaration.
Many governmental observers believe that Walker could be arranging a run at the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016. The Menominee statement suggested that Walker’s decision was made to placate conservatives that are in opposition to casino gambling. One prominent Iowa conservative, Tom Coates, recently penned a page to Walker urging him to reject the casino. That letter was also finalized by 600 caucus that is potential from Iowa.
No matter what the motivation behind Walker’s decision, numerous locals in Kenosha had been disappointed in your choice.
’ There were individuals ready to go to work down here, and that is not planning to happen now,’ Kenosha Mayor Keith Bosman told WTMJ.
With Kenosha Out of the real Way, Beloit Hopes for Federal Attention
It’s possible that Kenosha’s loss could be Beloit’s gain. Supporters of a Ho-Chunk Nation casino into the city hope that the rejection of the Menominee casino could suggest that their task will pass through federal now review more quickly.
The city and the tribe have experienced a deal that is preliminary place since 2012, but officials say these were told that the Bureau of Indian Affairs were delaying a decision in part because of the Kenosha proposal. The Ho-Chunk were publicly opposed to the Kenosha project.
Despite the rejection, however, the Menominee say they will soldier on.
’We must remember all the Menominee Nation has overcome in more than 10,000 years,’ the tribe said in a declaration. ’ We are going to continue steadily to thrive as a country and will still be partners that are honorable Indian Tribes in Wisconsin and around the country.’